Re: [evolution-patches] begging on my knees



> Interestingly it looks like this has been happening already. Maybe the
> hackers
> got a winding of your request before you even wrote the mail ;-).

I beg to differ. I didn't see this happen yet. In fact, I proceeded
deleting a bunch of those right after posting...


> I see
> this happenning in most mails that has been sent to the list except a
> few cases where the patches are so trivial its not worth reading for
> knowledge anyway. Ofcourse a fairly lengthy prognosis on the patch is
> rather boring to do and probably not even worthwhile.

Well, I do see a difference in the verbosity of the mails, depending on
some kind of "group" or "category" of the poster... Don't let me
elaborate on this. But "please review" is kind of redundant and implied
anyway.

Even a trivial patch can fix an urgent issue.

There are a lot of lurkers in here, who read this list to track the
latest development and decide whether a fix should be incorporated to
packages/releases/whatever immediately. They (we) do care about all
components, and it is pretty hard to decide about this on 3 lines of
context...


> Its a logical ask but really why *beg* for something already
> happening :-)

Cause I still get a lot of meaningless posts -- despite the fact Michael
mentioned something similar more than once in the past. It's logical,
but that doesn't mean humans do act illogical.

FWIW, the subject was meant as some eye catching line only to at least
get some attention -- and not being deleted right away. :)

...guenther


-- 
A: No.
Q: Should I put my reply above quoted text?





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]