Re: [evolution-patches] [calendar-plugins] some itip-formatter.c fixes



Sorry about that, I must have forgotten to send out an updated patch. I removed those two lines because they seem unnecessary and confusing (you would get those errors for every disabled calendar, which the user is not interested in at this point).

Let me know if you want me to put those two lines back in.

Carsten

On Aug 19, 2005, at 8:46 AM, chen wrote:

Apart from the patch sent, there are Unapproved and unnecessary changes
committed which does not solve anything.

Why was the following changes made ? The following was to tell user that
the calendar could not be opened due to some error.

@@ -270,11 +270,7 @@ cal_opened_cb (ECal *ecal, ECalendarStat

        if (status != E_CALENDAR_STATUS_OK) {
                d(printf ("Failed opening itip formatter calendar '%s'
during non-search opening\n", e_source_peek_name (source)));
-               itip_view_add_lower_info_item_printf (ITIP_VIEW
(pitip->view), ITIP_VIEW_INFO_ITEM_TYPE_WARNING,
-                                                     "Failed to load
the calendar '%s'", e_source_peek_name (source));
-
                g_hash_table_remove (pitip->ecals[source_type],
e_source_peek_uid (source));
-
                return;
        }

@@ -379,11 +375,7 @@ find_cal_opened_cb (ECal *ecal, ECalenda
                 * to find the item, this won't be cleared but the
                 * selector might be shown */
                d(printf ("Failed opening itip formatter calendar '%s'
during search opening... ", e_source_peek_name (source)));
-               itip_view_add_lower_info_item_printf (ITIP_VIEW
(pitip->view), ITIP_VIEW_INFO_ITEM_TYPE_WARNING,
- "Failed to load the
calendar '%s'", e_source_peek_name (source));
-
                g_hash_table_remove (pitip->ecals[source_type],
e_source_peek_uid (source));
-
                goto cleanup;
        }

As e_error_run would just return TRUE or FALSE, this not very much
required.

-                                       if (e_error_run (NULL,
"org.gnome.itip-formatter:add-unknown-attendee", NULL) ==
GTK_RESPONSE_YES) {
+
+                                       response = (e_error_run (NULL,
"org.gnome.itip-formatter:add-unknown-attendee", NULL));
+
+

Can we revert these unwanted changes. Harish ?

thanks, Chenthill.

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 23:29 -0700, Carsten Guenther wrote:

There was some really weird stuff in itip-formatter.c, like the
following statement:

if ((response == e_error_run (NULL, "org.gnome.itip-formatter:add-
delegate", itip_strip_mailto (a->delfrom)), itip_strip_mailto (a-

value)) == GTK_RESPONSE_YES) {

..
}
Attached patch fixes this and another location and gets rid of some
warnings.



OK to commit?

Carsten

_______________________________________________
evolution-patches mailing list
evolution-patches lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches

_______________________________________________
evolution-patches mailing list
evolution-patches lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]