Re: [evolution-patches] Patch about a11y bugs



On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 12:38 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 12:14 +0800, Li Yuan wrote:
> > Hi, JP and Rodrigo
> > 
> > Now I have a patch in a11y directory for cvs HEAD. It  fixes some a11y 
> > bugs. The patch has passed our internel review.
> >
> I understood last time you were going to have Sun approvals going also
> to the e-p list, wasn't it that what we decided last time?
> 
> > Please help me to review it. Thanks a lot.
> > 
> > @@ -143,14 +144,14 @@
> >         --n_events;
> >         if (n_events > 0)
> >                 g_snprintf (buffer, sizeof (buffer),
> > -                           ", %d events", n_events);
> > +                           _(", %d events"), n_events);
> >
> I think translators will complain about this string, because of
> different usage of singular/plural in many languages.
> 
> > @@ -144,17 +145,17 @@
> >         --n_events;
> >         if (n_events > 0)
> >                 g_snprintf (buffer, sizeof (buffer),
> > -                           ", %d events", n_events);
> > +                           _(", %d events"), n_events);
> > 
> ditto here
> 
> > @@ -279,7 +282,7 @@
> >                                             &end_year, &end_month,
> > &end_day)) {
> >                 ++start_month;
> >                 ++end_month;
> > -               sprintf (new_name, "calendar (from %d-%d-%d to %d-%d-%
> > d)",
> > +               sprintf (new_name, _("calendar (from %d-%d-%d to %d-%
> > d-%d)"),
> > 
> and here something similar might happen, due to the differences in date
> formats.
> 
> The rest looks ok to me code-wise, not sure about the a11y correctness,
> but if it passed your internal review, I guess you can commit to HEAD.
>
...after fixing the above mentioned problems :)
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]