Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #62665]



On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 22:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: 
> On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 12:52 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 12:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > I've tested it - it wouldn't be up for review if it hadn't been tested.
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 17:58 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > > During hard-code-freeze, we like to know how much patches have been tested
> > > > so that you're very confident that it won't introduce new serious bugs.
> > > > You are probably far more thorough than most, but still we'd like to have
> > > > that box checked.
> > 
> > What kind of testing are you looking for?
> 
> The more the better. For instance, it's nice to know when a bug
> submitter has used a patch for a while. This phase of the release cycle
> is scary, as I'm sure you know.

It will get additional testing via snapshots when it gets committed as
well.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]