Re: [evolution-patches] GNOME about box

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

All I can add is another vote for the YUCK camp.

Aren't we in UI freeze? :P

On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 09:38 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 15:53 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> > William Jon McCann wrote:
> > > Rodney Dawes wrote:
> > > 
> > >> It's not necessary really. It just means we need an extra file around to
> > >> compile for a static area. Everything will get relinked anyway when you
> > >> change it. It doesn't matter which of the two files it is in, in the
> > >> end. It just seems extraneous to keep two extra files for a single
> > >> function, just so we can keep the static array of strings out of the
> > >> file where it actually gets used anyway.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Ok.  Updated patch attached.
> > 
> > Drat.  Updated again so that it doesn't use gchar, doesn't explicitly 
> > compare against NULL in truth tests, and doesn't rely on C99.
>
> Well the authors list still isn't NULL terminated, and i changed
> e-shell-window.c a bit so it didn't quite apply, but after fiddling and
> adding some documenter and translator credits it looks ok and falls in
> with the other de-branding stuff I already did.  Anyone else have
> comments before I commit this? Jeff, Rodney?
>
> -JP
> -- 
> JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
> Novell, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-patches mailing list
> Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches

Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com> Ximian Evolution and Free Software Developer

Novell, Inc.