Re: [evolution-patches] fix for 57653 : toolbar visibility
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- Cc: William Jon McCann <mccann jhu edu>, evolution-patches lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] fix for 57653 : toolbar visibility
- Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 12:30:25 +0800
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 00:16 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 23:56, Not Zed wrote:
> Sweet. Looks good to me.
>
> I would only suggest you use
> prop[0] == '1'
wouldn't you want:
prop[0] != '0' ?
Either way should work since the prop will either be "1" or "0".
Its not the same as C.
same reason you don't check foo == TRUE, you check foo != FALSE
Well you shouldn't do that, if foo is a bool its just you check (foo) or !foo. In reality the compiler will implicitly check (foo != 0).
TRUE and FALSE aren't part of the C anyway (at least not ANSI-C), they're just convenience macro's defined by some libraries (e.g. X) for the language defined values of 1 and 0.
>
> rather than
> strcmp(prop, "1") == 0
>
> but its not really important (strcmp on gcc will be optimised to be
> something similar anyway).
>
> I'd say give 24 hours from when you posted it for anyone else to
> object, otherwise go for it.
>
>
> On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 16:45 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> > Shoot. This one doesn't leak the prop string.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > William Jon McCann wrote:
> > > I have updated the patch to address Michael's concern about multiple
> > > open windows.
> > >
> > > The toolbar status is now saved to gconf only in
> > > e_shell_window_save_defaults().
> > >
> > > Does this look ok?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jon
> > >
>
> --
>
> Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com>
>
> Ximian Evolution and Free Software
> Developer
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]