Re: [evolution-patches] addressbook config visibility changes

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

But if the code isn't compiled in, there's no way it could ever be shown/implemented.  i.e. if you have no ldap libraries, it wont ever/shouldn't show that, in the new folder window, or in the properties one.

On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 07:42 -0700, Larry Ewing wrote:
> I think the general idea is to have to properties dialog look just like
> the new dialog but with the unchangable attributes insensitive, long
> term the plan might even include allowing you to change types from the
> property dialog and in that case you'd want the widgets there.  But
> perhaps JP has a more concrete reason.
>
> --Larry
>
> On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 10:27 -0700, Chris Toshok wrote:
> > Hm, what's the rationale for this?  There's no real problem, except it
> > just presents a lot of insensitive UI when we know the user will never
> > be able to use it.
> > 
> > technically the patch looks fine, just wondering what the motivation is.
> > 
> > Chris
> > 
> > On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 23:46 +0000, Larry Ewing wrote:
> > > JP asked me to do this, it's obvious this was intentional so let me know
> > > if there is a problem with showing everything all the time.
> > > 
> > > --Larry
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution-patches mailing list
> > evolution-patches lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-patches mailing list
> evolution-patches lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches

--

Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com> "born to die, live to work, it's all downhill from here" Novell's Evolution and Free Software Developer