Re: [evolution-patches] possible work around for 58817



committed.

--Larry

On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 13:54 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 18:30 -0700, Larry Ewing wrote:
> > This doesn't fix the real problem in 58817 but is does make it less
> > severe.  I don't see a good way to dynamically rework the dates short
> > implementing some sort of custom e-clipped-date-range widget which is
> > probably out of range for 2.0.  Should we just go with this or can
> > someone think of something better?
> > 
> this looks ok to me for 2.0
> 
> cheers
> 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]