Re: [evolution-patches] Gal for Evolution 1.4 Patches

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

ps what happened to the plan, or at least, idea, about merging gal bits
into evolution/widgets, and dropping it?

On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 22:11 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 11:52, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> > Maybe we should change that policy then. It can bork up the snapshots,
> > if say, someone were to upgrade only gal, and something used that API
> > that got removed. I think we should make the change when we make the
> > offending commit, and append a .1 to the package version or something,
> > and packages that depend on the changed API can depend on the new
> > version. I would much rather avoid breaking other apps that may be on
> > a user's system, by not changing the libtool version.
> 
> Well, nothing else really uses gal and they are using snapshots.  I'm
> not really against it but I don't want to handle the bother between
> releases.
> 
> -JP
> -- 
> JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
> Ximian, Inc.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-patches mailing list
> Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches