On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 17:33 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 17:10, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > I've tested it - it wouldn't be up for review if it hadn't been tested. > > Murray was referring to: > > - Telling us why you think the change should not wait for the next > development phase. I think that should be obvious. the wrong folder gets deleted. it's also marked for 2.0.0 by JPR, not by me. there's been fairly strict 2.0.0 milestoning by JPR for all the evo bugs. > - If you want to break the Hard Code Freeze, then please persuade > us that the patch is very safe or has been well tested. I wouldn't be sending in patches that I didn't feel were correct and well tested, especially not this late in the release cycle. it's also a pretty trivial patch :) oh, and it's also already been approved by NotZed (the other Mail maintainer) Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. fejj ximian com - www.novell.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature