Re: [evolution-patches] patch to handle (recipient type) BC in appointments [calendar]

From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>
Cc: chenthill <pchenthill novell com>, evolution-patches ximian com
Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] patch to handle (recipient type) BC in appointments [calendar]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:06:36 +0800

Uh, but this is an abstraction, so it needn't be 1:1. BCC is more commonly used for this term.

On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 19:58 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:

On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 23:53 +0530, chenthill wrote:
> hi rodrigo,
> 	It is represented as BC in the soap interface, thats why we use BC.
> 
ok then




-- 







Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com>

"born to die, live to work, it's all downhill from here"

Novell's Evolution and Free Software Developer

References:
- [evolution-patches] patch to handle (recipient type) BC in appointments [calendar]
  - From: chenthill
- Re: [evolution-patches] patch to handle (recipient type) BC in appointments [calendar]
  - From: Rodrigo Moya
- Re: [evolution-patches] patch to handle (recipient type) BC in appointments [calendar]
  - From: chenthill
- Re: [evolution-patches] patch to handle (recipient type) BC in appointments [calendar]
  - From: Rodrigo Moya

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]