Re: [evolution-patches] fix for the second half of bug #46006, getaddrinfo suckage



committed

On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 20:41, Not Zed wrote:
> looks ok, i guess
> 
> On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 01:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: 
> > yep, you'd be right. turns out the correct function to be using is
> > getnameinfo().
> > 
> > new patch attached.
> > 
> > On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 12:23, Dan Winship wrote:
> > > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/getaddrinfo.html
> > > 
> > >         A numeric host address string is not a ``name'', and thus does
> > >         not have a ``canonical name'' form; no address to host name
> > >         translation is performed.
> > > 
> > > So it looks like it shouldn't even be calling getaddrinfo in that case.
> > > 
> > > -- Dan
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Evolution-patches mailing list
> > > Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]