Re: [evolution-patches] fix for the second half of bug #46006, getaddrinfo suckage

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

looks ok, i guess

On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 01:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> yep, you'd be right. turns out the correct function to be using is
> getnameinfo().
>
> new patch attached.
>
> On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 12:23, Dan Winship wrote:
> > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/getaddrinfo.html
> > 
> >         A numeric host address string is not a ``name'', and thus does
> >         not have a ``canonical name'' form; no address to host name
> >         translation is performed.
> > 
> > So it looks like it shouldn't even be calling getaddrinfo in that case.
> > 
> > -- Dan
> > _______________________________________________
> > Evolution-patches mailing list
> > Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches