Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] [resend] patches for #20672 (gtkhtml and mailer)]

[Larry Ewing <lewing ximian com>]

On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 14:48, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:21, Larry Ewing wrote: 
> > I don't really like storing the is_autosaved logic in the html engine at
> > all.  Up to this point the autosave code lived entirely on the composer
> > side and I would prefer to keep it that way.  
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > Is there any way you could implement this via the isDirty method on 
> > bonobo::persist*?  
> 
> Not AFAICT (looking at the other patch you mentioned), saving and 
> autosaving are different concepts.
> 

Agreed.

> > I'm not strongly opposed to this patch and rodo's approval is enough 
> > that I wouldn't mind it going in I would just like to avoid the 
> > autosaved references if possible.
> 
> Would you prefer a gtkhtml command to retrieve the undo step counter?
> Using that the composer could implement the autosave logic.
> 

That seems pretty reasonable.  Any thoughts Radek?

--Larry