Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] [resend] patches for #20672 (gtkhtml and mailer)]

[Michel Dänzer <michel daenzer net>]

On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 22:21, Larry Ewing wrote: 
> There isn't a pointer, I've been too scattered to reply fejj just asked
> me via irc and I told him I wasn't really happy with.  I meant to get
> back to you but I dropped the ball, I'm very sorry.

Okay, no problem, glad to know what happened.

> I don't really like storing the is_autosaved logic in the html engine at
> all.  Up to this point the autosave code lived entirely on the composer
> side and I would prefer to keep it that way.  

Agreed.

> Is there any way you could implement this via the isDirty method on 
> bonobo::persist*?  

Not AFAICT (looking at the other patch you mentioned), saving and 
autosaving are different concepts.

> I'm not strongly opposed to this patch and rodo's approval is enough 
> that I wouldn't mind it going in I would just like to avoid the 
> autosaved references if possible.

Would you prefer a gtkhtml command to retrieve the undo step counter?
Using that the composer could implement the autosave logic.


-- 
Earthling Michel D�er   \  Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast  \     http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer