Re: [evolution-patches] calendar client .pc
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo ximian com>
- To: William Jon McCann <mccann jhu edu>
- Cc: Evolution Patches <evolution-patches ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] calendar client .pc
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 00:07:41 +0200
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:12 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:35 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>What do you think about adding a pkg-config file for the calendar client
> >>libs? The evolution-calendar.pc seems to be strictly for backends.
> >>Perhaps something like the attached file?
> >>
> >>It seems that at the moment the only difference between a client and a
> >>backend is libpcs but I suppose that could change.
> >>
> >
> > the current evolution-calendar.pc works perfectly for clients. I have
> > been using it in gda-evolution (in gnome cvs) and in a little hack I did
> > (http://rodrigo.gnome-db.org/projects/tv-icalendar/index.php).
>
> Ok.
>
> > So, what are the problems you're finding to make this change?
>
> None, per se. It may make for a clearer separation of client and server
> and allow for the requirements of each to develop independently. But
> maybe that is because I don't understand the future of these APIs :) If
> they aren't going to change and it is not a big deal that building a
> client requires the server libs then there is no reason for this
> additional pc file (ie. the client and server will always reside on the
> same system and linkers are smart enough not to link to the unused
> server libs).
>
building a client doesn't need the server libs, so, well, maybe what you
say makes a lot of sense. I don't have a strong opinion on it, so let's
wait for other calendar hackers to give their opinions.
cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]