Re: [evolution-patches] mail forward/backward search patch

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

Sorry dude, i thought i'd replied to this.

I'm happy with this going in to 1.4, but it'd be nice if a new patch could be created for the 1.5 codebase, for the mailer patch, otherwise the feature becomes lost in 1.5.  As for the gtkhtml bit, someone else needs to poke their head up about that.

 Michael

On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 05:12, Suresh Chandrasekharan wrote:
> Hi,
> 	Crashes are not there now. But gtkhtml expose() does not behave right 
> with both the forward/backward search if for displaying the found items the 
> gtkhtml window need be scrolled. But that applies to both forward/back searches.
> 	
> If you are not for providing backward search as a feature in 1.4, what about 
> still keeping the code for backward search ( any way the existing code is buggy 
> ) in htmlclueflow.c ? So in that case just ignore the patch for 
> evolution/mail/mail-search.c and apply the gtkhtml one ?
>
> Currently we are busy with i18n issues for 1.4, may not have time to look into 
> the head if the same patch cannot be applied.
> 	
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
> >crashes, i think.  maybe its fixed in gtkhtml now?
> >
> >it was removed for a reason, and it wasn't afaik, multibyte (although it
> >could have been?).
> >
> >On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 10:53, Suresh Chandrasekharan wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> 	Do you remember what kind of instability it caused ? 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Suresh
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> >sorry, i formed a reply in my head but forgot to send anything ...
> >> >
> >> >the only thing re the mail part is that it was removed not merely
> >> >because it didn't work with multibyte character sets, but because it
> >> >caused instability.
> >> >
> >> >i'm not sure if this should be targetted for 1.4, since 'strictly', it's
> >> >a new feature.  also note that head does the search dialogue differently
> >> >(glade file), tho a similar patch shouldn't be too hard (you'd have to
> >> >add back the functionality though).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 07:56, Suresh Chandrasekharan wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi All,
> >> >> 	Once again pinging to see whether somebody has looked into this.
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >> Suresh
> >> >> 
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Evolution-patches mailing list
> >> >> Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> >> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches
> >> 
> >> Thanks & Regards,
> >> Suresh
> >> 
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Suresh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-patches mailing list
> Evolution-patches lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches