Re: [evolution-patches] fixes for both bug #42118 and #42120
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
- Cc: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>, evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] fixes for both bug #42118 and #42120
- Date: 01 May 2003 14:12:39 -0400
On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 13:40, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 21:40, Not Zed wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 03:58, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42118
> > > http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42120
> > >
> > > Eh... read the changelog :-)
> >
> > Umm, i have to strongly disagree with this behavioural change ...
>
> I strongly agree with your disagreement. :-)
>
> I actually thought we had agreed on IRC on *not* making changes to the
> behavior.
*sigh*..
clearly we need to change the behaviour of *something*. My original
solution was to just make Edit->Mark as Unread also undelete the msg,
just like the message-list toggle. but everyone told me that was the
wrong behaviour and that setting as unread should not cause the message
to get undeleted.
in fact, you went on to say that you shouldn't be able to change the
status of deleted messages at all, which is clearly not what you meant,
seeing as how if we really *did* implement things that way, there'd be
no way to *undelete* :-)
imho, we should at least be consistant. I don't agree that this was the
way to fix things either, but that's not what it sounded like what you
wanted yesterday...
Jeff
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]