Re: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #43241



note: /me split personality is actually Karsten Bräckelmann
<kb bluehash de> on bugzilla.


> > ok, then should it be unmarked for 1.4.x? or ?
> > 
> > I only wrote the patch because someone marked it as 1.4.x
> 
> It was marked as 1.4.x becuase it was thought to be an issue worthy of
> investigation in 1.4.x.
> 
> However, it doesn't look like there is an easy way to fix it without
> causing other problems, so I think we should rename it to something more
> generic like "Behavior of disabled accounts is confusing" and target it
> for 1.6.
> 
> What do you guys think?  (Anna?)

I do see the point in Anna's wish to get other users opinions and
respect this.

However, I don't see how that could actually be an issue to others. A
disabled account is just this: disabled. IMHO that applies to the whole
account and not only receiving and displaying (but sending). I already
have explained my point of view in the bug more than once.

I think, being presented with *disabled* accounts will be weird and
confusing to more users, than not being present with accounts disabled
on the explicit will of the user.


Seems, although the patch is done (thanks, Jeff :) we missed 1.4.1 due
to rescheduling...

I suggest 1.4.2 instead of 1.6.

...guenther   [ aka karsten ]


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]