Re: [evolution-patches] gconf unref fixes



looks ok.

should we just be using some mail_get_gconf() call instead (that returns
a static reference at that?).

e.g. what if we ever wanted to not get the 'default' gconf?

On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 06:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> don't leak refs to gconf-client




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]