On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 13:05 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 12:35 +0100, Sorin Srbu via evolution-list wrote:Yupp, the application and tenant-IDs etc?Hi, right, all those things. The page offers some defaults, you can try them (if you are lucky, the Application ID from there will work; if not, you can ask the admins to allow it). In fact, the admins do not want to "expose" anything, they only need to create (or allow the existing) an application as is described on that page and give you the Application ID. Everything is described on that page. Creating their own application ID gives them full control on the data being used by the application, by providing their own Application ID.
I have tried to get that access earlier at a few occasions as well as answers on what the tenant-ID is, but to no avail. From time to time, I get the feeling that "non-standard" mailers like Evolution Mail gets across as "dangerous" by the presumably Windows-centric mail admins at the central IT-dep't... :-/ Will try again. Thanks for the confirmation though.
I feel OAuth2 is rather cumbersome with Evolution, unfortunately.If it's not clear from the Wiki page, the cumbersomeness is caused by the Exchange settings, not by the application (Evolution) here. They make it rather complicated to setup for the EWS protocol. I just want to be fair.
You are right of course. I didn't quite think that through all the way. Apologies. -- Sorin Srbu, Serverdrift Karolinska Institutet Universitetsbibliotek Avdelningen för Verksamhetsstöd Enheten för Teknikstöd och Bildproduktion
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part