Re: [Evolution] "OR" statement in filter rules condition

[Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>]

On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 00:45 +0200, Ángel González wrote:
> On Milan Crha wrote:
> >         Hi,
> > not for your version, but the upcoming 3.16.0 has so called "Free form 
> > expressions" where you can combine 'and', 'or' and 'not' subparts. 
> > There might be a user manual entry for it, but at least the bug report 
> > link:
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550796#c10
>
> The new syntax looks nice. However, I would change:
>
> a) recips     | r   | To or CC headers should match
>
> Why "recips"? That's not a word. If we want to abbreviate "recipient",
> either recip or rcpt¹ would do.
> I would also add Bcc header to the list of headers that it can match.

"recip" (with or without the 's') is too close to "recipe", whereas
"rcpt" looks like "receipt". I think this needs to be spelled out.

poc