[Evolution] FAQ vs User Docs [was: reanimation of backup]

[Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>]

On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 07:52 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Milan, there's a warning at the top of that page to the effect that the
> FAQ is no longer maintained and no material should be added to it. I
> personally consider this a big mistake as in my view a FAQ and a
> reference manual are two different things, plus the FAQ is much more
> convenient as a reference point for specific issues, but that's how
> things currently stand.

I'm the one to blame as I added this. IMO anything that helps the user
should be in one central place - in the user docs. I don't consider the
user docs a "reference manual" (not sure what that term means).
And I welcome patches. :)

The problem might be where to make the cut - what is still a
*frequently* asked question and what it isn't.

Could you elaborate a bit?

andre
-- 
mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper