Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed
- From: Dragan Jurkovic <dragan jurkovic ca>
- To: awilliam whitemice org
- Cc: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Length of To: filed
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:38:43 -0500
Would someone care to explain why top post is bad?
No, this has been documented and discussed *to death* in a zillion
places and times.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style>
<http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#toppost>
<http://pthree.org/2009/10/19/top-posting/>
<http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html>
Thank you.
I wouldn't like to make similar mistakes in the future.
BTW message has been sent by our
external partner's MTA - Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959). Message
saved in Sent folder is fine, message received by recipients had To:
list replaced with "undisclosed-recipients:" and actual To: list moved
to the body of the message.
So the MTA was rewriting the TO: header into the body of the message?
It seems so - I was just wondering if by any chance Evolution was doing this.
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list gnome org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]