Re: [Evolution] Evolution release and major regressions, a longtime user's thoughts

["Art Alexion" <art RHD ORG>]

I understand & agree with your point.


--
Art Alexion
MIS/Central Office Support
Resources for Human Development

----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Montalenti <ajm pixelmonkey org>
To: Art Alexion
Cc: evolution-list <evolution-list gnome org>
Sent: Wed Apr 08 23:47:26 2009
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution release and major regressions,a longtime user's thoughts

Art, one clarification:

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> And that is precisely the problem.  N+1 is appropriate for Debian
> Experimental, but not for Debian Stable.  Ubuntu doesn't have those
> designations, and when a new version of the distro is released, it is
> released with the implication that it is stable.

The thing is, Evolution 2.26 is N for the GNOME community right now, and
2.24 was N at the time Intrepid was released (making 2.22 == N-1 at the
time of Intrepid's release).  Ubuntu should have cherry-picked 2.22, but
since it was N for GNOME, it was N for Ubuntu :-D

(Hope that isn't confusing!)

Andrew