Re: [Evolution] Thread Message View, Calendar View and general UI
- From: "Reinhard Brandstaedter" <Reinhard Brandstaedter jku at>
- To: <evolution-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Thread Message View, Calendar View and general UI
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:59:48 +0100
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 13:13 -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote:
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:13:28 +0100
"Reinhard Brandstaedter" <Reinhard Brandstaedter jku at> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 20:39 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
hi reinhard,
Am Donnerstag, den 02.11.2006, 13:56 +0100 schrieb Reinhard
Brandstaedter:
What information is used for threading if i don't use the fall
back
method by subject. Maybe the information is stripped by groupwise
or
any
virus scanner?
Evolution supports "References:" and "In-Reply-To:" headers.
"Thread-*" headers are Microsoft's proprietary headers and not
supported.
It seems to me exactly this doesn't happen!
If I switch OFF "Fall back to threading messages by subject" I don't
get threads at all!
I only get threads when this option is switched to ON but if i thread
by subject it's not correct.
I've checked the mail sources and they contain the correct header
information. KMail for example threads the messages correct, even if
i
only thread by header information and not Subject.
Reinhard
To get proper threading with a Groupwise backend, you need to use the
IMAP protocol vs. SOAP for connecting to the mail server. There's
give
and take here with regard to appointments and such, but I like my
threads, so I start Evo with 'USE_IMAP=1 evolution'
Try this and see if it's better for you (as long as IMAP is enabled on
that server).
Well that solved my problem for the thread view, thanks a lot.
However I have to check if there are problems with appointments this
way.
What is the reason threading doesn't work via SOAP though? Can this be
solved (in a future version maybe?)?
Reinhard
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]