Re: [Evolution] Word Wraping in Message Verticail Preview (Side-bySide)??
- From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" <poc usb ve>
- To: Saikat Guha <saikat cs cornell edu>
- Cc: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Word Wraping in Message Verticail Preview (Side-bySide)??
- Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:58:42 -0400
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 17:16 -0500, Saikat Guha wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 17:51 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is a FAQ and AFAIK you can't do it. The wrap boundary appears to be
hardwired at 70 characters, which apparently is inscribed in some
standard or other.
If it's a FAQ, can someone please tell me which "standard" this is?
From RFC-2822 (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html):
"2.1.1. Line Length Limits
There are two limits that this standard places on the number of
characters in a line. Each line of characters MUST be no more than
998 characters, and SHOULD be no more than 78 characters, excluding
the CRLF."
The RFC linked does NOT apply. From the RFC:
1.1. Scope
...
Note: This standard is not intended to dictate the internal
formats
used by sites, the specific message system features that they are
expected to support, or *any of the characteristics of user interface
programs that create or read messages*.
(emphasis added)
There is nothing that requires a mailer to *display* messages
hard-wrapped at n characters. The RFC linked only applies to
messages on the wire so to speak.
Fair enough.
Back to the OP's question:
Why does evolution not have a re-wrap feature?
I've no idea. I'm not a developer of Evo, but this question has been
asked before on the list and the answer has been along the lines I've
already mentioned (but evidently based on some other standards doc than
RFC-2822), thus my use of the terms "AFAIK" and "apparently".
poc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]