Re: [Evolution] Problem with ???

On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 15:13 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 14:14 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 20:55 +0100, guenther wrote:
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C231D124917; Tue,
        11 Jan 2005 06:13:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 38) id
        D6BB112437D; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 19:15:54 -0500 (EST)

It looks like has some choke point.

Yeah, and it's likely called "subscription required". ;-)

Every now and then posts by non-subscribers are approved and the queue
gets flushed, but that needs to be done manually. There are quite a few
mails from mid December making its way to the list recently...

Would it be better to configure * lists ximian com so that it
does not allow non-subscribers to post?

no, because then we get flooded with spam.

Why would *not* allowing non-subscribers to post get the lists
flooded with spam?

Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

"Your opinions are bound to affect the stories you choose to
broadcast [on TV/radio]."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]