Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.1.3 (and 2.1.3.1)

From: Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>
To: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Cc: evolution ximian com
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.1.3 (and 2.1.3.1)
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:48:48 -0400

On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 13:58 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:

Major New User Features:
* New IMAP provider (IMAP4rev1 account type for testing) that should
improve reliability


I see there are two IMAP options to configure for EDS:

  --enable-imapp=no/yes      Attempt to compile alternative, incomplete,
very unsupported IMAPv4r1 code
  --enable-imap4=no/yes      Attempt to compile yet another, incomplete,
very unsupported IMAPv4r1 implementation

What's the difference and which one is "better"?

poc

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.1.3 (and 2.1.3.1)
  - From: Jeffrey Stedfast

References:
- [Evolution] Evolution 2.1.3 (and 2.1.3.1)
  - From: JP Rosevear

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]