Re: [Evolution] evo 2

[Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>]

On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 15:08 -0400, jack wallen wrote:
> so i was reading up a bit on evo two on the footnotes site. from what
> i've read i might be glad i've not upgraded. sounds like there were some
> pretty major UI changes that, from the descriptions i've read, don't
> sound too enticing. 
>
> i think what surprises me the most is that evolution stands a good
> chance at getting a toe-hold in the corporate environment. this is
> partially because it has the element of familiarity (due to it's
> similarities to outlook). but now that is changing i can imagine people
> decided to NOT migrate because it's "different" again.
>
> not only that but the debate about making it 4 separate components?
> hello!!!! that would be a serious step backwards i would think. 
it's been always 4 separate components. The difference in 2.0 is that we
don't display all calendar/task/mail/contacts folders together, but
separately, and that now it is much quicker, so really worth the upgrade
-- 
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>