Re: [Evolution] glibc2.2.x and evo 1.4.6

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

You will probably have to either find an older/alternate package, or build the rpm yourself.

I can think of no practical reason (apart from some bugs) that requires glibc 2.3.

On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 08:49 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> I work in a large facility that runs a 3D application that requires us
> to be using glibc2.2.x and the latest rev of evloutions seems to require
> glibc2.3.x to run.. Is there any solutions that people know of?
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com> Ximian Evolution and Free Software Developer

Novell, Inc.