Re: [Evolution] Re: Re: Evolution ignores RFC 2060 ALERT status response

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

ok i see the bug.  can you file this in bugzilla.ximian.com, it will be
fixed in 2.0.

On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 05:30 +0100, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 11:54:44 +0800, Not Zed scribbled down:
> > Ok, i guess i'll have to say it again for about the 200th time then ...
> >
> > set CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG to 1 in the environment, and run evolution from
> > there.
>
> received: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen $MDNSent Junk)
> received: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted 
> \Seen $MDNSent Junk \*)]
> received: * 70 EXISTS
> received: * 0 RECENT
> received: * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1071782264]
> received: * OK [UIDNEXT 23707]
> > received: * NO [ALERT] Mailbox is at 92% of quota
> received: A00119 OK [READ-WRITE] Completed
> sending : A00120 UID FETCH 1:23706 (FLAGS)
>
> It uses this several times and yet no warning from evolution appears...
>
> -- 
> -jamie <jamie silverdream org> | spamtrap: spam silverdream org
>  w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms silverdream org
>  pgp key @ http://silverdream.org/~jps/pub.key
>  04:30:01 up 2 days,  5:34, 12 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.10, 0.21
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFAc4PMx2omo/Dc/KgRAphYAJ9oITUAsL5pkQ+svbn37YxF+stwQwCfZotb
> CjerSVZvlAD8MrnnUc95Fms=
> =fl28
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution