OK, I've filled in the bug report form and have built the file. Now - how do I attach the file to the bug report?
Tom Hightower
Solutions, Inc
http://www.simas.com
Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
06/17/2003 03:32 PM ZE9B
To: tomh simas com
cc:
bcc:
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4.0 *very* slow
if you're using bash, the nomral shell ...
quit evolution
open a terminal window
type
script
(hit return)
CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 evolution
(hit return)
do the evolution stuff, then quit it. you should get loads of stuff
printed to the terminal - you might want to cancel once it gets going
(you may get some duplicated mails though, if its started downloading
them).
the terminal should be back at a prompt
type:
exit
(hit return)
you should now have a file called 'typescript' which has all of the
output in it, you can attach that to the bug &/or edit it as well.
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 00:25, tomh simas com wrote:
> I'm not surprised that 1.4 is faster - at least I'm able to pull the email.
> At 1.2+, I wasn't even able to do that within a day.
>
> How do I set CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG = 1 in the environment?
>
> (can you tell I'm new to Linux?)
>
>
>
>
> Not Zed
> <notzed ximian com> To: Tom Hightower <tomh simas com>
> Sent by: cc: Evolution List <evolution lists ximian com>
> evolution-admin lists Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4.0 *very* slow
> .ximian.com
>
>
> 06/15/2003 10:09 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> open a bug on bugzilla.ximian.com
>
> run evolution with CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 set in the environment
>
> and attach some of the output to the bug (there willprobably be a lot of
> it, a lot of HEAD commands, etc, just include the first few hundred
> lines of output).
>
> my guess is the server isn't reporting uidl, you have 'keep on server'
> set, and we're having to manually resolve whether you've already
> downloaded the message using pop HEAD commands, etc.
>
> its probaly also not reporting that it supports pipelining, so every
> single message is taking a round-trip.
>
> (for me, 1.4 is about 3-5x faster downloading pop, over a high-latency
> link)
>
> On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 05:01, Tom Hightower wrote:
> > My setup: RH9.0 latest updates. My POP3/SMPT server is Lotus Domino
> > version 5.0.13 running on WinNT 4.0, service pack 6a.
> >
> <snip>
> > Now that I've upgraded to Evo 1.4.0 and RH9.0, it takes several *hours*
> > to fetch the email (after the initial fetch). I have another Lotus
> > Notes email database from which I am able to fetch, but on that one I
> > choose to delete the email from the server. Nothing has changed on the
> > Lotus Domino server side.
>
>
>
>
>