RE: [Evolution] RFC2342: Namespace

[Matthew Keller <kellermg potsdam edu>]

On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:03, Dan Winship wrote:
> > I guess it IS open to interpretation. I interpret both the RFC and the
> > FAQ answer as saying "This is how mail is stored on the server, but
> > compliant clients don't have to display the hierarchy that way".
>
> The FAQ probably does say that, but it's wrong.
>
> http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2003-May/029236.html

Very nice. Belated thank you's for the explanation. :)

-- 
Matthew Keller
Enterprise Systems Analyst
Computing & Technology Services
State University of New York @ Potsdam
Potsdam, NY USA
http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/