Re: [Evolution] RFC2342: Namespace
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- To: Matthew Keller <kellermg potsdam edu>
- Cc: evolution lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] RFC2342: Namespace
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:05:43 -0400
that still requires flattening of at least the first tree level, where
my example still has problems :-)
Jeff
Matthew Keller wrote:
I wasn't proposing flattening the tree. Goodness no, I'd be screwed!
Having the entire tree with INBOX as the root was my only gripe. For
example, I don't like have INBOX.LISTS.EVOLUTION or INBOX.SENT- I'd like
LISTS.EVOLUTION and SENT.
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 14:42, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
sure, a client could flatten the tree into a list... but what if the
user has folders named the same farther down in the tree?
ie, what if I have INBOX.INBOX ?
in a tree-like view, we'd see:
INBOX
INBOX
but in a flat list we'd see:
INBOX
which INBOX is that INBOX? the toplevel? or the user INBOX?
see the problem with flattening the tree?
Jeff
Matthew Keller wrote:
I guess it IS open to interpretation. I interpret both the RFC and the
FAQ answer as saying "This is how mail is stored on the server, but
compliant clients don't have to display the hierarchy that way".
I'm not complaining. I personally couldn't care less as long as I can
manipulate the tree elsewhere. I do see this as being a learning-curve
roadblock for users who I am hoping to migrate from POP to IMAP in the
near future, however.
Thanks for the response.
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:57, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
I fail to see what the problem is...? According to the FAQ that you
pasted, Evolution is doing exactly what the FAQ says it should.
2. Private folders are stored underneath the "INBOX." hierarchy
hence all folders are "under" the INBOX.
Jeff
Matthew Keller wrote:
Apologies if this has been asked before. The archives aren't readily
searchable, or I'd've done some more research before posting it- I did
search MY archives, but didn't find anything relevant.
I'm using Evolution 1.4.3 and I can't create IMAP folders against a
Courier IMAP server (latest version) unless they're "under" the INBOX,
and even the Courier-created mailboxes of Sent, Drafts and Trash are
displayed as subfolders of INBOX.
I've been using Evolution for years in a POP environment, so this is a
new thing for me. Any assistance would be very welcome. Below is a note
about this from the Courier FAQ.
q: I can't create any top-level folders, only subfolders of INBOX.
a: This is a configuration issue with your mail client. IMAP servers are
free to use any folder namespace arrangement that's technically
convenient for them. Courier-IMAP uses "INBOX." as the namespace for
private folders, and "shared." as the namespace for public, shared,
folders. The IMAP NAMESPACE extension (see
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2342.txt) allows IMAP clients to
automatically discover where the server creates folders, and your IMAP
client should implement it.
This should be completely transparent to you, if your IMAP client
properly uses the NAMESPACE extension. If your IMAP client were to
automatically take advantage of self-configuration features offered by
RFC 2060 and RFC 2342, it would automatically discover, without any
additional configuration from the user, that:
1. The folder namespace hierarchy separator is the . character
2. Private folders are stored underneath the "INBOX." hierarchy
3. Public folders are stored underneath the "shared." hierarchy
If you have to explicitly create folders that are subfolders of INBOX,
or if you explicitly have to name that "INBOX.foldername", this is due
to your IMAP client not being able to configure itself accordingly.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]