Re: [Evolution] Filtering out duplicate messages



If the feature is "dubious" and is likely to cause more harm/confusion
than good then its better not to have it - especially in open source
software, where those people that really need it - can create a patch
for themselves and others that want that feature. 

Maybe including every feature that everyone wants is a great idea... my
next bug report will be to file for a feature that cleans my kitchen
sink ... oh wait, xemacs already does that :-) 

On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 14:49, William X Walsh wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 18:08, simran wrote:
Personally i think the evolution team is making a very sensible
decision. 

If the "feature" were include, i can just image the emails on this
list... with people complaining about mailings going missing etc... 

Again, NOT a reason to not include a feature.  You just tell them, and
include in a FAQ, that they made the decision to activate the feature.

Just because YOU wouldn't use the feature is not a reason to support its
non-inclusion.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]