Re: [Evolution] A bug? Mismatched threads in evolution.

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

No, the threading is correct, if you check the references headers.  The
vfolder scheme question was a reply of the multisync message.

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:22, Tianran Chen wrote:
> I didn't looked at the code in Evolution, I'm not so sure how the
> Evolution match the threads. There are few messages that do not seems to
> belong to the same thread are listed into a thread. I don't know this is
> a bug or just the way it is.
>
> These are the summary of the mismatched messages:
>
>
> From:         Bo Lincoln <lincoln lysator liu se>
> To:   evolution ximian com
> Subject:      [Evolution] MultiSync
> Date:         27 Oct 2002 21:24:31 +0100
>
>
> From:         Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
> To:   HvR <hvrietsc myrealbox com>
> Cc:   evolution ximian com
> Subject:      Re: [Evolution] looking for definition of vfolder scheme
> language
> Date:         28 Oct 2002 13:32:55 +1030
>
>
> From:         HvR <hvrietsc myrealbox com>
> To:   Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
> Cc:   evolution ximian com
> Subject:      Re: [Evolution] looking for definition of vfolder scheme
> language
> Date:         27 Oct 2002 19:33:59 -0800
>
>
> From:         Jean-Marc V. Liotier <jim jipo com>
> To:   evolution ximian com
> Subject:      Re: [Evolution] MultiSync
> Date:         28 Oct 2002 02:04:37 +0100
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution