Re: [Evolution] I can't see the emails : No Sender, no body no subject

[Hamid Ghadyani <hrg spils com>]

I think our problem is different,
I had no problem reading and receiving emails, now I can't even see my
self-sent email !!!

Hamid

On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 00:14, simran wrote:
> woops... doh! attached this time :-) 
>
> On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 16:14, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > what attached real example?
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 00:02, simran wrote:
> > > Talking about disappearing headers from emails... i get approx 200
> > > emails a day (on a few lists) and on average 3-4 a day that are bad (see
> > > attached real example).
> > >
> > > The "bad messages" seem to have virtually everything stripped from the
> > > headers... does anyone else have a similar issue? I assumed it is a
> > > smapcop setup issue (as 123ehost.com where i host my email setup smapcop
> > > recently) and i have only had the problem since they set that up (about
> > > 2 months ago) - however, though i would ask the list, just in case its a
> > > known evolution issue? 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 14:07, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > You probably need to pick a font that works for your setup.
> > > >
> > > > go to the GNOME Control Centre and change it.
> > > >
> > > > Jeff
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 21:32, Hamid Ghadyani wrote:
> > > > > Hi there,
> > > > > IO just encountered this weird situation. Evolution  was working
> > > > > perfectly when I tried to add my native language to Redhat 8.0, but I
> > > > > kept using U.S. english keyboard and locale. Now when I open the
> > > > > Evolution, I can't see no summary text (only some small tiny weather
> > > > > icons) and all of the emails don't have the normal header : Sender,
> > > > > sunject, recipent ... And the worse, some of the even don't have the
> > > > > message body. I am sure there are something inside them, because when I
> > > > > go to File menu and ask for a print preview, everything is there and I
> > > > > can see the email !!!!
> > > > > Anybody have any idea ?
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Hamid
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> > > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > > > -- 
> > > > Jeffrey Stedfast
> > > > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
> > > > fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > -- 
> > Jeffrey Stedfast
> > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
> > fejj ximian com  - www.ximian.com
>
> ----

> > From unknown nodomain now au Fri Nov 1 03:03:00 2002
> X-Evolution-Source:
>       pop://simran list%40leonardchristian com mail leonardchristian com/inbox
> From: 
> Date: 01 Nov 2002 03:03:00 +1100
> Subject: No Subject
> Message-Id: <1036080180 23291 43 camel pingu sitesuite ss>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> "The Apache HTTP Server Project is proud to announce the sixth public =
> release of Apache 2.0. Apache 2.0 has been running on the apache.org =
> website since December of 2000 and has proven to be very reliable."
>
> I don't know of a better endorsement for the Apache 2.0.x series. The =
> general feeling in my enterprise is that Apache 2.0.x adoption rate is =
> skyrocketing and we are moving to it across the board. Also consider the =
> parity now available in Apache on Win2k platforms. Apache 2.0.x is the =
> first Apache with such parity between *nix and Win2k.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Remo Mattei [mailto:remo italy1 com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:07
> To: users httpd apache org
> Subject: [users httpd] Apache 2.x
>
> Hi guys can someone tell me if the version 2.0.x that comes with RH 8 is =
> a good stable version of I still should use the 1.3.x since this is =
> going to be a  big server that will have several hits.
> =20
> Thanks,=20
>
> REMO
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of users Digest
> ***********************************