[Evolution] Evo - First Class, IMAP (again)

[Martin Skjöldebrand <chimbis bahnhof se>]

Hi,

Further to the problem I reported friday, I skimmed the IMAP RFC and found

5.1.    Mailbox Naming

   The interpretation of mailbox names is implementation-dependent.
   However, the case-insensitive mailbox name INBOX is a special name
   reserved to mean "the primary mailbox for this user on this server".

Is there anywhere else in the RFC this is mentioned? Otherwise it is quite
possible to interprete it as that the primary mailbox SHOULD be called INBOX but
if it is called something else (i.e. Mailbox) you cannot use name INBOX for
anything.

Thus Evo would be too rigid in assuming that the primary inbox is called INBOX -
on the other hand, FC shouldn't crash when a client stubbornly looks for the
non-existant INBOX mailbox.

/Martin S.
Lacking gnupg for this mail.

-- 
Fake mail on the Internet from this address.
Public Key available on request