Re: [Evolution] Euro =?iso-8859-15?B?KKQ=?= =?iso-8859-15?Q?=29?= support in 1.0



So sprach »Jeffrey Stedfast« am 2002-01-05 um 15:10:30 -0500 :
There's really no use arguing over this because it's not an issue, it is
completely valid according to the rfcs and it also "Just Works".

Okay, you're right.  Technically it's allowed.  However, can we agree
that the way Evo encodes header fields is suboptimal?  If I type "wörter
€uro" in the subject, Evo will use 2 charsets: iso-8859-1 and
windows-1251.  This makes the subject unnecessary big, when using
nothing but iso-8859-15 would be sufficient.

Compare the way Evolution encodes "Test Subject with Wörter €uro ¢ent
¥en ä ö ü" to the way mutt does it:

Evo:
Subject: Test Subject with =?ISO-8859-1?Q?W=F6rter?=
        =?windows-1251?Q?_=88uro?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=A2ent?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=A5en?=
        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=E4?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=F6?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_=FC?=

mutt:
Subject: Test Subject with =?iso-8859-15?Q?W=F6rter?=
        =?iso-8859-15?B?IKR1cm8gomVudCClZW4g5CD2IPw=?=

It shouldn't be too hard to "inspire" yourself with the way mutt handels
this, should it?

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How to quote:   http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:       http://www.iso-top.de      |     Jabber: askwar charente de
   iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
                       Uptime: 22 days 1 hour 36 minutes




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]