Re: [Evolution] Contradiction with SMTP-AUTH PLAIN (Resolved)
- From: Roger <roger evolution starband net>
- To: Dan Winship <danw ximian com>
- Cc: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>, <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Contradiction with SMTP-AUTH PLAIN (Resolved)
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:19:40 -0400 (EDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
buta bing, buta bing!
yup, just finally did:
evolution-0.10.99-snap.ximian.200106271652.i386.rpm
(of course, you are right Dan. Only the latest snapshots have the NT LOGIN
or AUTH=LOGIN challenge)
& it does support the AUTH=LOGIN and appears to work just fine (as if a
simple plain text challenge would have any problems :).
Both test emails (one thru the local isp domain & one to a remote domain)
were sent and recieved without problems.
it took me 3 mos. to gather all the sources & to be able to finally
compile some of the required packages (snapshot gal had a .spec
finally...one of the last packages that i really needed). too bad there
are not some static builds of evolution & often changing libs, as to build
often & without having to rpm or install into the main o/s...etc.
(reduntantly said)
(mandrake 8.0)
On Friday 29 June 2001 09:41, you wrote:
This is why i'm getting confused...there is no option for "LOGIN" on
the
mechanism types (Send Mail options applet/widget).
LOGIN would appear as "NT Login". I assume you're using a snapshot,
right, not 0.10? Because LOGIN wasn't supported in 0.10.
Is anyone else successfully using NT Login auth?
-- Dan
- --
- -----
http://www.alltel.net/~rogerx/
(can also verify gnupg/pgp signature at the above url in About Section)
My ICQ UIN# = 21252173
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjs9DRYACgkQZA/JYxAFHWHhwQCeJ4mUrOZiZ1/ZjCQnMVd2HkkA
GY4AoKHSGJuzk0gm/AhzUlcxFGFfjve2
=Abu4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]