Re: [Evolution] some problems

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

Well I disagree.  Its just a way to organise the folders, not construct
the queries.

No other folders would work like this.  Each folder is essentially a
separate entity, but you're organising them heirarchically so you can
get to them easily, sure they may be related, but not necessarily.  I
think this would make the feature too hard to use, and more or less not
useful for how people want to use them.

Logically you'd expect someone to group things more - or - less this way
I agree, but imposing this restriction always doesn't seem a good idea.

 Michael

On 21 Jun 2001 21:56:01 -0400, Peter Williams wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2001 10:50:13 +0930, Not Zed wrote:
> > No, you don't need to do this at all.
> >
> > You just have to handle paths properly in the vfolder store stuff, it
> > already detaches paths from the query, it just doesn't do anything with
> > them.  And none of the vfolder editor/config code handles paths either.
>
> But logically, it makes sense that, if you have vfolder B contained
> under vfolder A, then vfolder B contains some subset of the messages in
> vfolder A. And if B's source is A, then this will be the case.
>
> --
> Peter Williams     peter newton cx / peterw ximian com
>
> "Why should I have to change my name? He's the one who 
> sucks!"                              -- Michael Bolton