Re: [Evolution] possibly stupid PGP/GPG display question

[Mike Newman<mike gtnorthern demon co uk>]

On 01 Mar 2001 00:50:05 +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:37:02PM +0500, Dan Winship wrote:
> > We're still not quite sure what it will be, so if people have ideas, let
> > me know. :-)
>
> As I see it, the icon would be in the message's header, right-aligned.
>
> Since an embedded message's header can be forged (in an HTML message),
> clicking the 'Lock' icon would raise a dialog box which'll verify the
> messages' authenticity. I'm not sure how that could be prevented from
> forged messages as well (given that the keylock link would still be an
> HTML code piece which could be included in HTML mail).


OK, no idea on the realism here, but can a 'real' GPG sig not appear in
a lower pane like the attachements do in the composer? Almost impossible
to fake I'd think.

Mike