Re: [Evolution] A few notes about the user interface

I completely agree with George here.  Maybe the RFC specifies
that forwarding messages as attachments is "correct", but when
I forward a message I usually want to make comments to it, so
forwarding inline is much more efficient.  In many cases I think
that forwarding as an attachment is completely stupid.

If Evolution insists on being "correct", please at least offer
the option.  Isn't one of the big end goals ease-of-use???  Being
able to forward inline by default would make it easier to use than
forcing me to go poke around in the menus to do it.


i think he meant it's correct from an RFC point of view.


Le 2001.04.02 18:10:48 +0200, George Farris a écrit :
Sigh, when will people learn that there is NO correct way to these types
of things.  The "correct" way for me is to have the forward inline
because thats the way I use it 99.9% of the time.  Why? because I'm
generally commenting about lines of text in the forward and I need to
read it too.

Settings->Composer->Default.fwd.behaviour=(inline, attachment)

Now everyone could be happy.

Assuming how someone else's mind works is a crap shoot.

This has been debated at length, months ago.  Forwarding as an
attachemnt is the correct way, and why it is the default behaviour, and
will not change.

evolution maillist  -  evolution helixcode com

evolution maillist  -  evolution helixcode com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]