Re: [HC Evolution] RE: Exchange...

[Wayne Pascoe <wpascoe realmedia com>]

As far as I know, a company called Bynari are working on a mail client to
support Exchange (Trademail). Does anyone know if they have opensourced any
of this or if they would be willing to provide advice on the Exchange side
of things ?

-- 
/*   Wayne Pascoe <wpascoe realmedia com>       */

On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Fernando Madruga wrote:

> I agree that MS Exchange compatibility is a BIG +. I don't know if you guys
> know of something called MS Exchange SDK:
> (http://download.microsoft.com/download/exchplatinumbeta/Install/4208/NT5/EN
> -US/EX2kSDK.exe)
> I work at a company with 15 Windows NT servers all running Exchange for
> local emails/calendaring and all interconnected. I'm also willing to abandon
> MS Windows+Outlook forever so I'll be more than pleased to do some testing
> here... I can also 'dig' for information and I have several years of MS
> Windows programming expertise that I can put to work to help you guys
> wherever I can. I don't, yet, have any sort of experience programming for
> Linux... :-(
> Feel free to ask, I'll try my best to help,
>   Fernando Madruga
>   fmadruga ascoimbra pt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Kemp [mailto:kempa kwic com]
> Sent: terça-feira, 21 de Março de 2000 3:28
> To: evolution helixcode com
> Subject: Re: [HC Evolution] evolution(ary) focus
>
>
> I agree fully.  Exchange integration is good, but I think we'd all agree
> that we would like something more stable than that for the back end ; )
>
> Exchnage support will help get an "in" into the corporate world, so if
> that's a goal, so is exchange, but on the other hand, a new, better product
> can make the same impact.
>
> Aaron
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Dent" <cdent kiva net>
> To: <evolution helixcode com>
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 4:35 PM
> Subject: [HC Evolution] evolution(ary) focus
>
>
> > I've read through the various introductions from people on this
> > list and some of the documentation on helixcode and have been
> > very impressed by the diverse backgrounds of the people involved
> > and the diverse needs that Evolution wants to satisfy.
> >
> > For myself I was rather surprised at my reaction to Evolution.
> > I'm an ISP system administrator, generally far more concerned
> > with server side stuff than clients but when I read about
> > Evolution I got all tingly and thought, "ooo, there's something I
> > want to be involved in." I'm not quite sure why, I think it's the
> > strong devotion to a pluggable modular architecture.
> >
> > One thing, though, that has me concerned and has my attention is
> > the amount of attention (both on the list and in the helixcode
> > pages) Microsoft (especially Outlook) gets.
> >
> > I agree that in order for Evolution or any other "groupware"
> > client to gain acceptance it needs to operate in the segment as
> > clients like Outlook, and even talk to servers like Exchange.
> > However I hope that can remain a secondary goal. Having dominance
> > in a marketplace does not in any way indicate that a product is
> > the best.
> >
> > I hope that Evolution can focus primarily on the excellent core
> > architecture as well as compliance with open standards like IMAP
> > and its associates.
> >
> > And then as a secondary focus integration with other types of
> > mail stores.
> >
> > And somewhere in there I think it would be very cool to mess
> > around with different interface options. Mail client applications
> > have looked the same for a long time. Is that because the
> > interface makes sense or because we haven't thought up a better
> > one just yet?
> >
> > Just thought I would throw that out there.
> >
> > --
> > Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot,  CDent.....Not a
> mule
> > are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. -Byron     kiva.net
> mail=433
> >                I tried without overkill or shadow boxing. -mg