Re: [Evolution-hackers] Using an ECalObjModType enum as a property

[Iñigo Martínez <inigomartinez gmail com>]

Hi,

Oh, I had not seen E_TYPE_CAL_OBJ_MOD_TYPE. I was thinking about the
scope of the modifications on a recurrent event, I'm trying another
aproach though.

Thank you for your kind support,

Best regards,


2017-02-10 9:22 GMT+01:00 Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>:
> On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 21:51 +0100, Iñigo Martínez wrote:
> >    g_object_class_install_property (object_class,
> >       PROP_MOD_TYPE,
> >       g_param_spec_enum ("mod-type",
> >                          "Modification type",
> >                          "The modification type of the event",
> >                          ECalObjModType,
> >                          E_CAL_OBJ_MOD_THIS,
> >                          G_PARAM_READWRITE));
>
>         Hi,
> check the documentation of the g_param_spec_enum(), the parameter is
> meant to be a GType, but you pass it an enum name instead. The proper
> value comes from e-cal-enum-types.h (included through
> libecal/libecal.h, in this case E_TYPE_CAL_OBJ_MOD_TYPE.
>
> By the way, why do you want an object property "mod-type"? It's usually
> used as a function argument, not much useful as the object property,
> from my point of view. Or you use it as some sort of default?
>         Bye,
>         Milan
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers mailing list
> evolution-hackers gnome org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers