Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH evolution-data-server] imapx: Remove check for NIL separator
- From: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>
- To: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak v3 sk>
- Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH evolution-data-server] imapx: Remove check for NIL separator
- Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:31:25 -0500
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 00:37 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
This has been tested with MUNI IMAP server along with:
Subject: [PATCH evolution-data-server] imapx: Treat BODY[HEADER] as equivalent to RFC822.HEADER
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:10:57 +0100
Message-id: <1388347857-1479-1-git-send-email-lkundrak v3 sk>
camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c b/camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c
index c86165b..c924d39 100644
--- a/camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c
+++ b/camel/providers/imapx/camel-imapx-namespace.c
@@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ camel_imapx_namespace_new (CamelIMAPXNamespaceCategory category,
CamelIMAPXNamespace *namespace;
g_return_val_if_fail (prefix != NULL, NULL);
- g_return_val_if_fail (separator != '\0', NULL);
/* Not bothering with GObject properties for this class. */
Thanks for that. I remember not being sure about that assertion when I
wrote it. Either the RFC wasn't clear or I missed some fine print.
I'll commit this and your BODY[HEADER] patch for the next release.
For future reference it's better to submit patches to our bug tracking
system [1] so we can... well, track them easier.
Matthew Barnes
[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]