Re: [Evolution-hackers] Regarding API breakage and lost test cases

[Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>]

On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 20:47 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I vote for Tristan's 2), basically because it's the right approach in
> client-server architecture, also used in evo-mapi (and maybe in evo-ews,
> I do not know). Basically, if client doesn't have anything it was asked
> for, then it doesn't mean that the server doesn't have it too.

Having e_source_registry_ref_source() make secret blocking D-Bus calls
is out of the question.  I just spent a good deal of effort eradicating
all that from our libebook/libecal APIs.

Matthew Barnes