Re: [Evolution-hackers] Further thoughts on ESources

[Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>]

On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 10:30 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> Reconnect?  The usage pattern I envision for proxy object is to
> connect, obtain all the sources somehow (details TBD), and then just
> listen for the occasional add/remove/change signal.  If the proxy has
> to reconnect and refresh its set of sources, it's trivial to filter
> out by UID the sources it already knows about.
> 
> Point is, all the details should be hidden in the proxy object.
> Should be transparent to clients. 

	Hi,
yup, if it'll be transparent and the consumer will not crash on Source
factory crash, then that's what I was hoping in. The thing is that I
stopped receiving "Remote peer vanished" on factory crashes for some
reason. I didn't investigate further, but I've a feeling it has
something to do with "close connection" change done recently. Anyway,
will see when I find a mood to investigate here further.
	Bye,
	Milan