Re: [Evolution-hackers] Removing libical fork, moving to new upstream?

[Chenthill <pchenthill novell com>]

I was not able to try the upstream libical yet. I am right now packed
with some other work, so I will try to get this done as soon as
possible.  Suddenly the weekends have gone out of my hands as I have to
move out of station to places that do not have internet connectivity.
Either me or suman will make the changes and get the work done for
2.25.1 if the time is sufficient to get libical as a external dependency
for GNOME 2.25.1. We would test the library and let you know before oct
17th.

thanks, Chenthill.
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 14:41 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 22:52 -0400, IGnatius T Foobar wrote:
> > >> I have applied Chenthill's memory management patches (only to the 
> > >> 'libical' directory and to the examples -- still have to do the 
> > >> 'libicalcap' and 'libicalss' directories) using function names ending in 
> > >> "_r".  
> > > IMHO, HANDLE_LIBICAL_MEMORY can be removed.
> > >   
> > 
> > Ok folks, it's done ...
> > 
> > The remaining portions of libical (libicalcap and libicalss) have been 
> > converted to the "_r" API.   (The test suite still uses the old API and 
> > will continue to do so for a while.)
> > 
> > Now is the time for Evolution code to be updated to use the new calling 
> > syntax.
> > 
> > Is there anything we can do to facilitate this, or should we just hang 
> > out and wait for you folks to kick the tires on the new library?  Let me 
> > know...
> I will make the changes and test it over this weekend.
> 
> thanks, Chenthill.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Evolution-hackers mailing list
> Evolution-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers